Oh god, this is going to be a fucking wheeze for influencers.
They take a £1000 commission for a video saying “don’t cross guys, it’s not worth it”.
Smugglers and their ilk continue pushing the other message.When your life is shit, and one person is saying “life is wonderful in the UK, minimum wage is 5x what it is here, you can easily find work, we’ll offer you finance for the transit fees”, and the other is saying “don’t go to the UK, you might get deported”, which one is going to have more effect?
It’s all about presenting, here’s some ideas:
- Say “Don’t cross guys it’s not worth it” While sipping drinks while getting a manicure.
- Say “Don’t cross guys it’s not worth it” At the golf course just after a swing.
- Say “Don’t cross guys it’s not worth it” In the hospital where a cute nurse just walked out of frame.
- Say “Don’t cross guys it’s not worth it” While stepping out of a Rolls Royce.
- Say “Don’t cross guys it’s not worth it” After finishing a big meal in a fine restaurant.
I hope someone makes that kind of videos.
The biggest deterrent the UK has is that these poor immigrants will have to deal with the conservatives and their inability to understand anything.
If they are prepared to put up with that I’m not sure anything will stop them coming.
They really should just put up a Conservative campaign stand in Calais
“Be the change you want to see in the world”
Not to mention the Streisand effect. They will get the exact opposite effect which they desire. But maybe it will be the lesson Europe needs…
Deport the HomeOffice. So many problems will go away. FFS these clowns. It’s a cursed brief for anyone.
What do you bet they haven’t actually got any information to suggest that the immigrants are even watching these influences?
Surely they would be looking at content created by their fellow countrymen who have already gone through the immigration process, so presumably they already know what it’s like and still reckon it’s worth it.
This is clearly aimed more at a home audience than the migrants. Who knows if the migrants even speak English
Look if you’ve got people fleeing war and poverty via small boat channel crossings the only effective deterrent to disuade those making the crossing for a chance at a much better life for them and their children will be shooting the small boats.
Needless to say, that’d be a horrific crime against humanity.
So how about actually having grown-up conversations with the EU about how to tackle migration and fix the broken legal immigration system.
They have already been offered a solution which they don’t want to take because they like to use the “immigration problem” as political red meat to throw at their idiot supporters, who by now are the only people who continue to support them.
They are literally consulting with the US republicans on how to run a political campaign, so we’re not getting honesty or integrity here.
Fleeing war and poverty… in France?
No they are fleeing war and poverty and then they go to France but obviously they don’t want to stay there because who would want to live in France?
If you think the British are racist you’ve not seen anything yet.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The government has been using taxpayer money for social media adverts aimed at deterring potential asylum-seekers for the past three years, in France, Belgium and Albania – but The Independent has previously reported how they had instead targeted tourists and business travellers.
Under this expansion, the government will also seek to pay influencers on sites such as TikTok to warn of the risks and repercussions of travelling to the UK by small boat, and has been drawing up lists of social media celebrities who could be suitable.
Research shared with The Independent showed the Home Office paid Meta at least £35,000 for hundreds of Facebook and Instagram adverts shown to people in northern France and Belgium between January 2021 and September 2022.
A prior investigation by The Independent in 2022 also found the Home Office had paid £2.7m to Hong Kong-based firm Seefar since 2016, which conducts “migration awareness-raising and behavioural change campaigns”, including a controversial government website which saw ministers seek to deter asylum-seekers.
While such arrivals fell by more than a third in 2023, nearly 30,000 people did enter Britain that way, making it the second highest year on record, despite the government criminalising such crossings and pressing on with its ailing plans to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda as a deterrent.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “People smugglers frequently use social media to peddle lies and promote their criminal activities, and it is vital that we utilise the same platforms to inform migrants about the truths about crossing the Channel and coming to the UK illegally.
The original article contains 512 words, the summary contains 258 words. Saved 50%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
