Utterly ridiculous for a singleplayer game. These aren’t even listed on the Steam store page. For some reason I thought id was better than this.

It’s blocked from firewall so I don’t think it’ll successfully call back home (unless they did some Steam networking trickery I guess). I just hate this bs on principle.

    • Mwa@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sorry for necroposting but:
      Thank God we have FreeDoom, but that’s only a WAD replacement for ultimate DOOM and DOOM II.
      Especially after it was bought by Bethesda and then later Microsoft.

      • Lembot_0006@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Look at GZDoom. And add a BrutalDoom addon. Good old Doom but modern and with Blood-tier amount of blood :)

        • Mwa@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          you also have UZDOOM(for the engine,works for GZDOOM mods) and project brutality(fork of brutal doom,adds improvements and such,currently in alpha) as alternatives
          while the zombies will be from Doom instead of FreeDOOM on both mods,its alr and minor issue.

    • Drun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They are still making one of the most exceptional games at the market. Not independent - yes. But if it’s the price to actually deliver games this quality - sign me up.

      So… To the OP - agree the agreement and just play. It didn’t make the game worse.

  • Damarus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not exclusively single player, however I’m not sure if anything would prevent them from only making you accept these agreements when you select multiplayer in the menu.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nothing would prevent them from making you accept this bs after you clicked the multiplayer button, i think some other games do that too

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    While the multi-player is now dead it wasn’t in 2016.

    I see no issue with making the player agree to any of those.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s actually nice that the agreements are broken up instead of being in a mega agreement.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            It makes it easier for your lawyer to organize the briefing document she prepares for you when she’s suggesting whether or not you agree to the terms of the contracts.

            What, not everybody has their lawyer look over contracts they’re about to agree to? What, so they just act as their own lawyer and carefully review these legal documents without the benefit of a law degree? That sounds risky!

    • Lojcs@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I was today years old when I learned Doom has a multiplayer… I doubt many people buy this for its multiplayer. They could selectively ask those who click on the multiplayer if that was their concern.

      Looking at achievement stats, 32% of people finished the campaign while 12% of people won a multiplayer match. So I’m not alone in thinking of Doom as a single player game

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        it doesn’t matter what you think. It had a multplayer because gamers were screaming for a Multiplayer doom. The game is 8 years old and since there have been more Doom games. Blizzard is not going to update the thing to remove the TOS crap.

        • Lojcs@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Am I not allowed to be infuriated on the mildly infuriating community? I don’t care why it was put in there or if they’re going to remove it after seeing this post. I’m here to vent because I find it scammy to force this on every player (most of which didn’t even play multiplayer) despite not even listing it on the store page like they’re supposed to.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re not enforceable, binding laws anyway. It’s a bunch of corporate CYA. They want to be able to tell a judge someday that they did everything they could to inform you of their business practices and get you to agree to use their product responsibly. The company’s chance of facing a court action is much higher than a user’s chance of being held to whatever they agreed by checking a box.

    • Lojcs@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Probably bought this as part of a bundle a long time ago. And I don’t feel like spending time pirating it while it’s already installed