I’ve been on Mint with Cinnamon for about 5 years across desktops, laptops, and home server
I had to update a machine with a version of Mint that was EoL this year, so I just upgraded through several major versions in a row with no issues
It was interesting seeing how much more polished each upgrade process was
And it keeps growing, there are another 5 that didn’t fit in the screenshot
I created a symlink to the directory the symlink is in. If I try and simply ‘delete’ the symlink in a file browser it tells me that gigs of data will be deleted
That beginners guide says to avoid creating circular symlinks. What if, entirely hypothetically, I already have a circular symlink?
Linux Mint on desktop, laptop, and home server. Doesn’t hurt to have the full install on the server, and I have a monitor hooked up anyway - but makes maintenance easier with everything the same distro. Batocera on the retro gaming pc.
Android on phone, but if there was a distro for my phone I would use Linux there too. F-droid for apps where possible, but Play store for some essentials.
I wasn’t thinking in detail, just addressing an assumption I think a lot of age verification discussions include, which is that the verifier would have to be trusted to maintain some sort of account for you, retaining your data etc.
I have no idea what the legislation says, but I’d be a happier privacy-conscious user if the verification platforms were independent (i.e. not in any other data business) and regulated, with a requirement they don’t retain my personal data at all (like the liquor store example)
So the verifier gathers data from you, matches it with a request from the platform, provides confirmation that some standard has been met, and deletes almost all personal information - I acknowledge that this may not rise to the double-blind standard of the original request
Edited to add:
you don’t have to ‘buy’ a token, the platform needs to pay verifiers as a cost of business
some other comments are asking how you prevent the verifier knowing the platform - to my mind you don’t, instead the verifier retains a request id record from the platform, but forgets entirely who you are
A joke answer, but with the kernel of truth - IRL age verification often requires a trusted verifier (working under threat of substantial penalty) but often doesn’t require that verifier to maintain any documentation on individual verification actions
I found the same about engagement - every post had 5000 comments but only the top 100 could generate actual conversation, everyone else might as well be talking to themselves
I browse by new, so I often see the spam advertising and bad faith garbage (Logic_&_Ethics anyone?) so I just block liberally
I literally don’t know what I’m missing
ETA: I also don’t have a language set, so if I see a foreign language community with no English posts or comments I’ll just block it
2 instances
175 users
515 communities
I thought reading The Grapes of Wrath was like watching Requiem for a Dream - I’m glad I did it once, and I will never do it again
Thanks, I was more worried that there was something completely wrong security-wise with that approach!
Genuine question from someone with a single page static site - why is Cloudflare a useless suggestion?
And I’ll argue it’s on-prem even if you don’t have the physical server in your building
It tells you right there in the log: “DRDY”
I love every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpanzee…
If it is powered on but blank screen, you can try terminating the user session from a terminal
https://linuxiac.com/how-to-terminate-user-session-in-linux/
I did the same thing, set up OpenWRT perfectly, then changed the local range from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.0.0 to suit some legacy connections. Everything works, except I can’t change settings on the router, so for now I leave it alone
Can we have Google Chrome?
No, we have Gogle Chome at home