• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Hey Zack, would you take a paycheck if one was offered to you?”

    “Sure would, friendo!”

    These articles are so dumb when you think about them for a minute. I know why Hollywood news sites keep publishing them, but I don’t know why people keep clicking on them.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember on 9/11, some TV reporter on some major channel who wanted the stock “everything was traumatic” story from a maintenance guy who got out of one of the towers shortly before they came down.

      Reporter: So you were in the sub-basement when the impact happened? How long did it take you to get all the way up to the doors and out?

      Maintenance guy: I’d say it took about forty seconds.

      Reporter: That must have seemed like a long time.

      Maintenance guy: I’d say forty seconds. Maybe thirty.

      Reporter (clearly exasperated): Yes, but how long did it feel like?

      There’s a lot of fluff in media.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I understand the desire to have that human interest piece, but as a journalist if you’ve already written the story before you do the interview, you’re a bad journalist. Fluff isn’t necessarily bad (interviews with kids in Gaza is super useful for our understanding of the war, for instance); it just becomes bad when a reporter or an editor decides what the story is at the beginning.