pacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前I absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageI absolutely love VideoLAN's stance regarding patentslemmy.dbzer0.compacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前message-square66fedilink
minus-squarehglman@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·2 年前No, the proof - program correspondence is in both directions.
minus-squareGeniusIsme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·2 年前Correspondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前I’d say if you ask a mathematician, they would disagree with you. But maybe that depends on how far they have gone into maths from common sense
minus-squarenakal@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前That’s why it’s also called Curry-Howard isomorphism.
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Correspondence is not correlation.
No, the proof - program correspondence is in both directions.
Correspondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.
I’d say if you ask a mathematician, they would disagree with you. But maybe that depends on how far they have gone into maths from common sense
That’s why it’s also called Curry-Howard isomorphism.
Correspondence is not correlation.