• pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Sony caused them to malfunction to the point where the user bought a new controller, then I’d consider that damaged. The controller could no longer be used for its intended purpos.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they intentionally made 3rd party controllers not function with their product, that’s monopolistic behavior and should absolutely be stopped.

        If Sony didn’t provide any message saying it was an unsupported device and caused people to buy new devices, that would be considered damages.

        • PrincessEli@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they intentionally made 3rd party controllers not function with their product, that’s monopolistic behavior and should absolutely be stopped

          Fucking hardly. It’s their shit, they can make it compatible with whatever they like.