I’m looking for a way to watch recent Nebula plus videos. I only have two short videos that I am looking to watch and I don’t think that justifies the cost of a subscription, though I would gladly pay 50p for each video.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sign up, watch videos, cancel account. Or look for pirated versions, but Nebula is one of the places that has yet to turn shitty.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plus it’s hard to believe that it will since it’s creator owned and the creators who own it mostly have integrity.

  • 1boiledpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I understand pirating from Netflix and such, cause they’re big companies and their service is shit, but Nebula is run by creators and you support them directly with a subscription. So if you have $5 at your disposal I would highly encourage paying for Nebula.

  • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just a few weeks a ago “Real Engineering” relased a video about how Nebula works. Literally talking about the streaming protocol used and the technical aspects of it. Nebula is definity pirateable with ffmpeg if you properly edit the m3u8 file, from what I can tell.

    But seriously, I’m with most other people here … just pay for it for a month an cancel. It’s a really great platform and I’d feel bad ripping from them. I actually bought the $300 lifetime membership the other day.

    If you have some means of recieving donations, PM me, I’ll send you the $5 for a month.

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if the $300 is sort of like extra startup money to get better hardware, infrastructure, software improvements in the short term. I honestly have no idea. I pop on there sometimes to watch the full length videos from YouTube and there is some really great content, but not necessarily enough. Their UI/apps could definitely use some work, though I have not checked recently.

      I really hope they continue to run and it looks like I need to catch up on some content. I took a break from most YouTube/TV/etc. I cancelled all of my other subscriptions, but I have no reason to not support a company like Nebula, especially at their price points.

      I am not going to debate the ethics of piracy or people’s justifications for or against it. It isn’t productive. I do think this is an instance where you are better off paying for a month than spending a lot of time trying to get it another way. Sometimes, I like to put things in the perspective of I make X dollars an hour, how many man hours did I spend to do X task? Cost benefit analysis. This isn’t always practical, thus the “sometimes”.

      • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder if the $300 is sort of like extra startup money to get better hardware, infrastructure, software improvements in the short term

        Yes, it totally is. It says so in the video I was refering to. They basically needed some capital but didn’t want to be accountable to traditional investors. He explains it much better in the video.

    • ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      the fact that they offer a lifetime subscription tells me that they don’t care about sustainability and will disappear within a decade

      • LocustOfControl@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A tiny fraction of their users paying upfront (remember opportunity cost of money) is hardly going to doom them to insolvency.

        Look at this way - investors give money to a company now to receive money later. They risk capital now in exchange for future rewards. Lifetime subscribers pay a large fixed amount now to receive free service later. Same thing.

      • scarrtt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re probably just leveraging the good will they have as the plucky underdog. I personally found the app clunky and that the videos loaded really slowly, but I don’t blame them for offering a lifetime subscription.

        Either that, or it’s just price anchoring and they weren’t expecting anyone to spend $300, but it made the other options look cheaper

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t do them like that. This is the type of service our money should actually be going to, for now.

    • secret_ninja@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Generally speaking, If we don’t support small businesses, large corporations win and we all lose.

      • CatTrickery@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe those services shouldn’t use similarly predatory models that rely on immoral subscription rather than ownership.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Think about how this would actually work. Suppose you paid some small sum for access to a piece of content.

          Fairly speaking, you should only get one chance to download it or one physical copy. That’s how it’s traditionally been. The ability to download it multiple times (which is what happens when you stream content) is a service, and it costs a lot of money.

          Streaming would therefore be pay-per-view, since you are paying for each individual copy of the data that has to be transmitted to you. It wouldn’t be fair for you to just pay once and watch once and have paid the same price as someone who paid once but watched it fifty times, thereby consuming fifty times as much server power.

          Most people would find it more convenient to pay a large sum upfront in exchange instead of going through the hassle of making dozens of micropayments.

          In order to encourage people to make those large upfront payments, content creators would probably offer deals whereby users could get unlimited streams of their content if they commit a certain amount each month. This means their revenue is predictable and the expense is also predictable for the viewer.

          Congratulations. We have invented the pricing scheme of cable television.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would gladly pay 50p for each video.

    Nebula is $5 for a month and half of that goes to whatever videos you watch.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since you’re open to paying, have a look around the video descriptions of channels like Wendover and HAI, they often have promo links to get nebula for around ~$25-35 for the year, works out to just under $3 per month.

    I’m not aware of anywhere that pirates Nebula content, although I’m aware that floatplane (similar but less popular platform) used to get pirated to YouTube on a regular basis a looooong time ago

    • claudiop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, you can navigate de UI freely and watch the first video for free without any account. What else would you need to know the platform? There’s a free trial of Nebula called YouTube. Everything in there except the exclusives. When you’re convinced they have the content you want, it’s 3€/mo so… whatever.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can the comments please stop finding a reason to pirate? Not everyone needs reasoning to pirate.

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s exactly 0 comments reasoning piracy 🙃 what the hell is going on? Are bots influencing my opinion not to pirate stuff??

      (Also, since when pirates are so chicken, everyone has their own reasons and they shouldn’t be shamed for this or something. I thought it’s piracy lemmy, not a leagally obtained content lemmy)

      • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        At the end of any pirated content there is some guy that actually “ripped” it. Someone that probably payed for it that then decided to share the copy with the world.

        I think this community is generally very piratey and not controlled by bots. If you can’t find anyone willing ripping a specific source of content … well, that’s quite telling.

        You want Nebula content to be piratable? Go rip and seed it.

  • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    All you pirates in the comments are a disgrace. It matters not the intentions or quality of the people who built the paywall.

    • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree, even though I stand accused. I’m looking into ways to pirate nebula. All of it. Their entire DB is only around 30TB.

      But when I do, won’t share for now. A pirate can respect and spare a worthy cause from being plundered.