I read a lot of answers online that its a bad idea, but the arguments did not make a lot of sense. “it’s a heavily ingrained part of the eco system”. Well if I can change it, what’s the deal?

It makes more sense to make an interrupt signal be the harder shortcut, and copy to be ctrl+C, matching other programs and platforms.

  • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve done it for about a decade without anything bad ever happening.

    I have rebound copy and paste to ctrl+c and ctrl+v in konsole and bound the interrupt to ctrl+x using stty intr ^x

    Also I keep it consistent across ssh sessions by using Xpipe.

    I honestly wasn’t even aware that anybody thought it might be bad for any reason.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why? It seems like you would want to kill a program more than copying text. Is it just a habit thing?

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        1. Not in my workflow. Usually programms terminate after doing their job. And I copy the output all the time to google for stuff or to put it in another terminal or another command.

        2. Ctrl+X is not significantly more difficult to press than Ctrl+C. But Ctrl+Shift+C is.