As long as the abortion is safe, within existing term limits, and has fully informed consent, who cares who performs it and by what method?
While your comment is correct.
I wonder how it is relevent. As the whole argument about this bill. Is that some think it will decriminalize exactly the restrictions you list.
“…some in party expressed concern it goes too far.”
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Later this spring, MPs are due to have a free vote on a proposal by the Labour MP Diana Johnson to abolish the criminal offence associated with a woman ending her own pregnancy.
Some senior Labour figures have privately expressed concern that Johnson’s proposal goes too far because of the provision of telemedicine in England and Wales, whereby a woman seeking an early-stage abortion can be prescribed tablets at home without seeing a doctor.
Under rules introduced during the Covid pandemic and later made permanent, women in England and Wales can obtain abortion pills at home after a remote consultation.
There are concerns that under Johnson’s proposal, a woman who misleads an abortion provider to obtain pills to terminate a pregnancy at home after 24 weeks would not be committing an offence.
Some senior Labour figures want to see a narrower proposal that in effect ensures women can never be imprisoned for ending a pregnancy, but does not completely remove the criminal offence.
Calls to overhaul the law have grown louder since Carla Foster, a mother of three, was jailed last year for ending her pregnancy by using pills after the legal time limit.
The original article contains 945 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Article lists a bunch of women voting in favour. Be interesting to see the gender breakdown of votes after.
