Swift is well-suited for creating user interfaces thanks to the clean syntax, static typing, and special features making code easier to write. Result builders, combined with Swift’s closure expression syntax, can significantly enhance code readability.
  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    2·
    9 months ago

    I never said it was fragmentation, I simply implied that the fact that someone is writing bindings for a language that while open is mostly apple centered says a lot about the lack of a decent development framework.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.ggEnglish
      3·
      9 months ago

      I mean it’s a student project. It literally could be “I think Swift is cool and I like Linux.”

      And you know… They’re not wrong, Swift is a cool language, it’s just not got much adoption outside of the Apple ecosystem for whatever reason. It’s long been workable on Linux … I’m happy to see some novel work in this space.

      Swift is also interesting because while it’s general purpose, UI design was always in mind for Swift. That’s different from C or C++ which are the basis of GTK and Qt the predominant UI frameworks used for the Linux desktop currently (Rust might enter that conversation more seriously with Iced and System76’s COSMIC).

      You’re also right that there are options … but there are also options in the Windows world. Everybody isn’t using what Microsoft uses and even Microsoft doesn’t use the same UI toolkit everywhere.

      • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        I don’t disagree with you. I believe I wasn’t very clear about my view.

        Swift is great yes, a very decent language and as you said also made to take UIs into consideration and I’ve nothing against it. Now, when people do projects like this it usually comes from a place of need, of not being very happy with the current toolset and/or the belief that something could be made better. This project, besides being a student project, must have some roots into that as well.

        I’m happy there are Swift bindings available but it really just proves what I said earlier - people feel the need to experiment with other things because their current Qt toolset might not be enough or provide a great experience.

        but there are also options in the Windows world. Everybody isn’t using what Microsoft uses and even Microsoft doesn’t use the same UI toolkit everywhere.

        Yes… but we all know there’s a LOT more fragmentation in the Linux space. Qt is probably the most cohesive and ecosystem-like way to develop desktop Linux applications but once again it’s not like what we have on Apple and Microsoft. Both of those companies provide at least one complete development ecosystem that is very tightly integrated with their systems and one can pick up learn and be very productive with it and unfortunately under Linux we things a bit more scattered around.