Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agoI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up11.88Karrow-down1138file-text
arrow-up11.74Karrow-down1imageI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzOha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agomessage-square124fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·2 years agoI get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
minus-squareInstigate@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down3·2 years ago I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it. I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance. Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoI mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoWell somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoDid you mean “this” stance, maybe?
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoI suppose that would also have worked, but no.
I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
I mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
Well somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
Did you mean “this” stance, maybe?
I suppose that would also have worked, but no.