• Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Can you explain why? It’s fast, sure, but it’s simultaneously the most important character design choice you can make and also cripplingly absent of actual choices.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Rather than front-loading decisions in character creation, you get a bunch of more interesting choices to make at each level up, including an elegant multiclass system. In other systems, I feel like the only interesting things you get at level ups are just a few points here and there, and you already made all of your most important choices in the hours you spent creating your character. In 5e, just about every time I level up, I feel like I found a new gear to shift into. As a Fighter, for instance, there are tons of interesting choices to make at level 3 just within the Battle Master subclass, let alone other subclasses. The 5e rules sure aren’t perfect, and I definitely haven’t sampled every RPG system out there, but given that they all had old D&D rules to learn from and solve problems within, I think 5e solved a ton of them in really clever ways compared to others that I’ve tried. Character creation is just one of them.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Many classes do not get any choices at many levels. Sometimes the choices are thin.

          Also calling 5e’s multi classing system elegant is extremely generous. It works, some of the time, but it’s extremely prone to making weaker characters with the occasional high power interaction.

          Fate is an elegant system.

          Also class-and-level is only one way to make a game. You could just not do that and open up whole new worlds.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Many classes do not get any choices at many levels. Sometimes the choices are thin.

            True. But I’m also playing with Xanathar’s and Tasha’s, and with a choice of so many classes, you tend to gravitate towards the more interesting ones, so if one class is a dud, it doesn’t weigh too heavily on the game when there are more interesting choices available.

            Also class-and-level is only one way to make a game. You could just not do that and open up whole new worlds.

            You can, but it’s not an inherent downside to have classes like this either. The things they’re allowed to do and not allowed to do create some clear strengths and weaknesses.

        • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          In comparison to other games I’ve played I find this the opposite. Proficiency and ability scores basically never change after creation. And level ups allow for very very little decisions and distinction other than class.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          5e is incredibly front loaded. In Pathfinder you get so much more choice as you level up.