downpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前preachlemmy.worldimagemessage-square420fedilinkarrow-up14.95Karrow-down1121
arrow-up14.83Karrow-down1imagepreachlemmy.worlddownpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前message-square420fedilink
minus-squarewowitsverycool@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down3·2 年前leave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 年前It wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
minus-squareAphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 年前ChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
minus-squareBeeko🐈@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前Where did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.
leave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
It wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
ChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
i can if i waaaant to :3
Where did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.