Experimenting with local alt text generation in Firefox Nightly – Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog
hacks.mozilla.org
Firefox 130 will feature an on-device AI model that automatically generates alt-text for images, integrated into its built-in PDF editor.

New accessibility feature coming to Firefox, an “AI powered” alt-text generator.

"Starting in Firefox 130, we will automatically generate an alt text and let the user validate it. So every time an image is added, we get an array of pixels we pass to the ML engine and a few seconds after, we get a string corresponding to a description of this image (see the code).

…

Our alt text generator is far from perfect, but we want to take an iterative approach and improve it in the open.

…

We are currently working on improving the image-to-text datasets and model with what we’ve described in this blog post…"

    • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
      2·
      7 months ago

      Well I do agree it’ll be useful for people who need it, but for most people it’s pretty pointless and I hope at least they don’t enable it by default just like Windoze sticky key because ai use a lot of system resources for a little benefits especially with self hosted ai

      • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
        12·
        7 months ago

        beehaw is a safe-space, we shouldnt villify the experiences/needs of people who need alt-text. this could be game changing for people who need it.

        • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.orgEnglish
          2·
          7 months ago

          Alternatively, it could be very frustrating for people who need it. Computer-generated translations are often very bad compared to human ones, and image recognition adds another layer of complexity that will very likely lack nuance. It could create a false sense of accessibility with bad alt-text, and could make it more difficult to spot real alt-text if it isn’t being tagged or labeled as AI generated

          • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
            3·
            7 months ago

            i don’t think we disagree in a vacuum but bringing that up in the context of this particular thread is probably unhelpful