• ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    need to vote third party on an occasion when third party will actually get that 5% threshold

    non sequitur

    You weren’t really very open to ideas. And, you were the best of the bunch in this thread.

        • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You really had no interest in engaging with me did you? Because I basically fully agreed with you in my previous comment and you said I wasn’t open to ideas.

          • ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            OK. I’ll assign more benefit of the doubt.

            To be moral and ethical in their voting choice, to serve systemic design intent, to serve the practicalities of implementation, an individual need not care about others’ votes.

            So, it’s incorrect to set as a prerequisite a belief in success of a 5% goal to vote for it. Presenting as you did exemplifies the propaganda-fed ego of the neoliberal. The meaning in voting is not to make you feel good about yourself for choosing the bandwagon that wins. All should vote for whom best represents them with reckless disregard for the short-term outcome.

            The eventual counterargument to what I’m saying is rooted in utilitarianism: Democracy produces at best mediocre outcomes. The systemic design answer was the electoral college.