Having tried all three, its a stark difference in how much more social Lemmy is comparatively. Its not even close. Almost all posts I’ve encountered on lemmy have interaction; whereas, more often than not, posts on the other two platforms have no interaction. Wonder what the driving factor is behind this difference?

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve never heard of Nostr but Mastodon is a twitter clone and I don’t find that style of website suits discussion well since you subscribe to accounts rather than communities.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s an interesting dynamic!

      I find myself talking more on lemmy as others say because it’s easier/made for talking about topics. Mastodon and other fedi services center around following the account that made a thing rather than the thing(s) themselves. And that’s fine, both have their place.

      • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think the other aspect is the easy to follow discussion threads. IMO it’s the cleanest way to show and follow branching discussions.

        • mesamune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I do like how it “looks” the most on topics. I wish mastodon had something similar revolving around their posts/hashtags.

    • ryan213@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      You follow hashtags. It’s what I do and it’s been a good experience so far.

      It’s about the same as on Lemmy engagement-wise.