• The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Traffic jams would be a whole lot less damaging if they were all electric. Just sitting there with the AC and radio on is a whole lot less emissions compared to fossil fuels.

      • izzent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I prefer a rock solid public transport system, and plenty of safe walking areas and no-car zones. EVs help minimally in the grand scheme, since they are costly to produce, especially the batteries.

        • hydro033@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yea, that only works for cities. America will still need tons of cars for everywhere that isn’t a city. It’s a very low density country, all things considered.

          • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s large swathes of territory nearly as dense as parts of Europe with incredible public transit. Look at the density of Spain and overlay it on top of the northeast US, then compare the public transit.

            • hydro033@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea, but the northeast, especially major cities like NYC, Boston, and Philly, does have better public transit than a lot of the US. I know it still sucks overall (and don’t get me going about the costs), but a lot of the infrastructure was built during the car boom. People do like cars, and they make sense for most of America given how much sprawl we have.

              • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Local transit of those cities is pretty good, I’d agree. But the lack of intercity transit, like high speed rail, is such a shame.

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Which won’t happen especially in car first cities. I am in Michigan, it’s the home of the automobile and everything is built around it. To accommodate a good mass transit they would need to demolish large portions of the cities to install rail lines because busses are a lack luster bandage. Even with cities with great bus lines like Lansing or Ann Arbor it still can take hours for a trip across the city when a car gets you there and back in minutes. Business will also need to accommodate and give longer time off for doctors appointments. My wife rides the bus often in Lansing and if she has a appointment that is only a 10min car ride she is gone for 3 hours on the bus.

        • Thurkeau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Good luck with that, though. If this is America, and I think it is, we find ways of making a good public transit system suck. I also think we need to take a hard look at how our towns and cities are desined as well, and make them to where they’re optimized to be able to drive into a central location then bicycle or hoof it to whrever you wanted to go within a couple miles.

      • seedbrage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s true, but electric cars won’t fix the core issue of car dependency and massive traffic jams

      • possiblylinux127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The two issues I have with current EVs is you can’t work on them and they don’t last as long as gas vehicles.

        I have a old suburu and it still runs fine

        • Corhen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Its also worth remembering there is a lot less maintenance to do on an EV. No oil to change, lubes to replace, belts that break…

          Besides the batteries, an EV car should last longer than a gas car.

          • Negromungusschlong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            They have the same components except the engine, but they weigh more and the batteries dont last as long as a well maintained engine. EV cars should not last as long.

            • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They have the same components except the engine

              • Transmission (usually larger and more expensive than the engine)
              • Exhaust, muffler and catalytic converter
              • Gas tank, fuel pump and vapor hose
              • Ignition coil(s), spark plugs, oil pump, intake and exhaust manifolds and fuel injectors
              • Fucking belts
              • CV joints, differentials and transfer case (I think)
            • Corhen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              DRM… which makes you need to replace belts, and oil?

              I didn’t say they were easier to work on, just lower maintenance. On my gas car i need to change the oil ever 6 months. You dont need to do that with an EV.