I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don’t see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It’s like they’re painting their faces with “here, take my stuff and don’t contribute anything back, that’s totally fine”

        • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
          11·
          20 hours ago

          Sorry, but I or rather many hate your Opinion.

          Its ok if you dislike my Opinion about that. But I will show you, that many dislike your Opinion with a little fun and humour.

          I believe that this has nothing to do with growing up, but I think thats your opinion you can attempt to follow.

          • Jay🚩@lemmy.ml
            1·
            8 hours ago

            Lol even GNU and fsf failed at implementing gplv3 at all levels in Linux. And with gplv3 redhat gets awa with what they do. Also see recent agplv3 lawsuit. Gpl enforcement is real issue. If fsf wants why no create true copy left strong license no exceptions!