• Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Removing DRM has always been “illegal”.

    However: German concentration camps were legal, while families protecting Jewish citizens from being taken to said concentration camps was strictly illegal.

    What’s legal is not always right (ethically and morally), and what’s right is not always legal. Remember that.

    • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’d like to clarify that removing DRM does lie in a grey zone in many countries, including in the US due to some court rulings. In some countries the right to make a backup of your e-book might have priority over copyright law for example.

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sure, but companies who employ DRM have argued against that grey area since DRM was a thing. Something something IP/copyright/licensing/whatever bullshit… IMO: fuck you, I bought it, I own it, eat shit.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Correct… How are they going to enforce their “property” rights when I do it at home?

          These corpo parasites are delulu hence why I stopped spending money on media.

          Get fucked.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        The DMCA makes it pretty clear that “Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures” is illegal. There are no exceptions for whether you own or redistribute the content in question.

        • Pirata@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t care what some stupid US law says. It doesn’t apply to me.

            • Pirata@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              It really wasn’t.

              You tried to make it about the US when the topic is about a company that operates internationally, that’s what.

              Personally, I wouldn’t be surprised is breaking national law in many countries with their one-size-fits-all approach.

              But I’d rather just not give a crap about that and just keep pirating my books.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                It really was. Do you not know what the DMCA is? It’s US law.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sometimes doing something illegal is anti-social behavior. Sometimes it’s anti-authoritarian behavior. These are not the same thing.