• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      What did they pirate specifically and why nobody is suing them for it? Please go ahead.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        What I said in my last comment was

        Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

        I’m not sure why this didn’t satisfy your pedantry before, but maybe you didn’t read it when you replied to it last time.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Ok, I see now.

            I was saying that they benefitted from other people pirating their games.

            You thought I meant that they benefitted from pirating their own games.

            I can see how what I wrote could be interpreted that way. But no, I meant that they benefitted from their games having been pirated in the past by pirates.

            • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I think you misunderstand the root of the argument. You’re referencing Nintendo copying someone’s rip and that seems illogical - DRM circumvention is illegal under DMCA and similar laws, right? Nintendo is the owner of the license and not licensee for those things however so they can’t really circumvent anything and therefore there is no law against that. Nintendo can download Mario roms off the internet legally because they are the publisher and won’t sue themselves obviously.