• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You’re just trying to tire me out but I’m persistent.

    Nintendo download roms, never disputed. What is Nintendo guilty of? Please state rule even if it is a cracktro scene rule because at this point I’m certain you know there is none.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Why do you keep using words like “accuse” and “guilty”? Lol

      Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

      This is what I’m saying. I’m not even sure why you seem to be trying to make this a fight or an argument or something. “Tire you out”? Lol

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        You keep coming back to this like it’s important in any shape. No laws were broken. Adult people who work at big companies chuckled at this happening. Damages were estimated at $0. It’s like you’re morally trying to convict Nintendo of something on a technicality but I’m still not sure what is that crime. Unless you have anything new to add that’s it for me.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          laws

          Damages

          guilty

          morally convict

          crime

          …lol

          What are you going on about?

          The reason I kept showing you the same comment is because you said things like “I’m deeply confused” and asking me what I’m saying.

          I’m not even arguing with you. But you seem to be putting a lot of effort into reading an argument into what I’m saying. Is this how you enjoy spending your time on social media? Lol