I keep thinking this would have been a much better sell to devs and to users. I have always used Sync, and Boost. I tried the official app a few times, but really only used it for the chat feature. I didn’t want to pay for it, but (I am embarrassed to admit it) I would pay premium to keep my app. I think this would have worked out better for Reddit than the garbage they are pulling right now.

Would that have been a more reasonable solution in your opinion as well?

  • Viper_NZ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think if they’d framed it properly, in that by using Apollo I’m bypassing their ad revenue and costing them money, I’d see it as a reasonable compromise that I pay for Premium to support the company and carry on using Reddit in the way I preferred.

    Now? Fuck u/spez

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah. Like two or three weeks ago if they said third party apps need to create a couple dollar per month subscription, then I probably would have bit. Now, with the current leadership? Nope.

  • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would have considered that at the start, but at this point they’ve damaged their ecosystem so much, and correspondingly Lemmy has grown a lot, so I don’t see why I would go back either way.

    • Fubarberry@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah exactly. My trust and relationship with reddit has been damaged. Even if they roll back all the API pricing changes the damage is already done.

      At the very least they would need to fire spez for me to think anything has changed or is going to get better.

    • HERRAX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, the fact that he seems devoted to following musk’s business practices leaves litte faith for Reddit to ever get back on the right track again. Besides, I’m loving my time here at the fediverse and will probably start selfhosting my own private Lemmy server soon!

  • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wouldn’t have paid for, but i would have accepted much better. “API usage is ad free hence only premium users can access it” is much better than “API users are freeloaders that take more than they are giving, fuck them!”

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If they had given us a heads up that we would need a subscription, early enough in advance.

    If they didnt limit the content we could access.

    If the price wasnt ridiculous - Im not paying Netflix, Amazon Prime, or Game Pass money to access a web forum.

    Then sure.

    But Spez fucked it up. Hes shown that he really doesnt care about the communities, the people that make it up, or even reddit itself. Hes too bent on making that IPO and bailing out as soon as he can.

    • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I went ahead, downloaded the official app just to rate it one star, and unmodded myself from all my subs.

      Ooo now there’s an idea. You’re an inspiration.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. They’re allowing more and more spam outside of their ad platform. They’re actively user-hostile. I already don’t like it for free, why the hell would I want to pay for it?

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Absolutely not. If I learned something from Twitter and Facebook and Reddit fiascos then it is to never ever let youself be trapped into a closed-source, centralized for-profit platform. So NO, unless they make it completely open source and decentralised so anyone can setup their own instance. But then again we already have Fediverse and Mastodon and Lemmy… so why bother with that, let’s improve what treasure we already have.

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would have IF it had been the solution Reddit had came up with in the first place AND they hadn’t destroyed my trust in them with their handling of the protests.

    I have an issue with your proposed solution though: it does not address the use case of moderation / accessibility / utility tools and bots.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No reddit is dead to me. Anything that is used by ceos to fuck over the people. Let it burn for all I care.

    Actually scratch that. Let it pump to obscene levels and after all those rich riches have bought in. Dump that thing into the Earth’s core.

    Far too much money and corruption in this world.

  • Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hah, no. Are you asking if I want to pay for access to a platform that is already dependant on its users to create or aggregate content, while they are already making ad money off my eyeballs? Heck, no, never. If that site cannot make enough money on ads alone, while being one /were of the most visited non-porn sites on the internet, then maybe they should reconsider their other expenses. E.x. Is it really necessary to have a downtown office in an expensive us city, or pay out high CEO wages. I can only really conclude that they are being stupid about this. If they want me back, they are going to have to beg.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe before spez dug his heels in the ground. But now he’s said too much. He admires Elon? Fuck off.

  • small44@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No i don’t want another subscription. Never had a problems with ads as long as they are not abused