• Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s been ages since I did IT. If I had a user who wanted to run Linux then I knew that, on average, they were going to cause me a lot less headaches with random user issues so I wouldn’t mind being flexible. Endpoint security will be different, but a lot of network security is handled through network devices that don’t care what the client is.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If I had a user who wanted to run Linux then I knew that, on average, they were going to cause me a lot less headaches with random user issues

      In my case, it’s the IT team which creates more issues for Linux users.

      Whenever they change security policies, they never test it out on Linux and our connection goes down (some VPN/Firewall/DNS policy). It takes ages for us Linux users to convince them that we didn’t do any changes on our system and this problem is on their side.

      • Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m so glad to be away from corporate IT and working with small teams of highly technical people where every request isn’t “ok I’ll fill out the paperwork” but "Hmm, we could do it like this: " We just created a small network, gapped from everything else, where you can just use the bandwidth but cannot possibly affect the production network. Since our bandwidth utilization is generally around 5% of maximum it’s not issue to grab things using a 10Gb chunk of a few hundreds of Gb of bandwidth. The traffic is tagged with a low priority QOS packet so even in the worst case it will never affect network operation.