Jamesj999 Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days ago

‘Heads will roll’: BBC reckons with bias accusations over Israel and Palestine coverage

www.theguardian.com

external-link
message-square
19
fedilink
44
external-link

‘Heads will roll’: BBC reckons with bias accusations over Israel and Palestine coverage

www.theguardian.com

Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
19
fedilink
As controversy still swirls over Gaza documentaries, corporation braces for further criticism from all sides, including inside
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, whoops. Here you go:

    https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/37661027

    Edit: original: https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/3bf38d29-c6d6-403d-9c72-14f7bd712764.mp4

  • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The ideas at any time something something are those of the ruling class

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Removed by mod

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t the BBC extremely pro-hamas/anti-israel already?

      No

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes

        • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you three…‽ It would explain your absolutely atrocious understanding of the world around you, and it would be a fine excuse for your conversational/debate “skills.”

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t bother, he is a genocide apologist.

            • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              I usually say such things to such individuals not as a way to bring them out of their obvious delusion, but as a way to highlight said delusion to others that read it afterwards.

              • FelixCress@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                bring them out of their obvious delusion,

                Doesn’t work with this one, have a look at his comment history.

                • wewbull@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Top tip: When you quote someone don’t cut off “…not as a way to…” at the start of a quote.

                  I’m doing this not as a way of bringing you out of your obvious delusion but to highlight it for people reading later.

                • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  whoosh

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Judging from the statistical variation, there is a big gap between how each side is mentioned, the emotional weight of the words used for each side, and the way that the conflict is described from each perspective. The BBC strongly favors the Israeli side of the conflict.

    • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, they have a ‘This morning with Hamas’ from 0600-0700 every day

      • Codpiece@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Followed by Homes Under The Hamas.

        • omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          A Hamas in the Sun after that

          • Codpiece@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            A Place In The Sunni.

            • omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh this is much better

United Kingdom@feddit.uk

unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 435 users / day
  • 1.07K users / week
  • 2.39K users / month
  • 6.45K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 5.03K subscribers
  • 2.7K Posts
  • 25K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • tom@feddit.uk
  • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org