No. I am dedicated to the concept of people being able to express their views without idiots trying to ban them for expressing their views.

I never said it will be me engaging in the discussion.

They won’t be downvoted and ignored

Why wouldn’t they be downvoted in the sub dedicated to marijuanna?

they’ll spawn 5 replies

What you mean is they will engage in the discussion. Good, this is what Lemmy is for

people who just want to talk about marijuana will feel like their fan community is now a debate club

This is still the discussion about marijuanna, not about classic cars.

You are making no sense unless your point is “I am entitled to air my view without any opposite views contradicting mine”. If so, go away sweetie.

Someone going into a “marijuana” community and saying “marijuana is bad”

And? Than he will be downvoted or ignored. Why would you advocate removing his post (assuming he can link to a scientific study proving his point - I don’t know if he could).

Communities should not be overly moderated

You should have stopped at that.

Pretty much the only comments/posts which should be removed are these posted by bots, these outright illegal, these supporting nazism (in all it’s iterations, including bashing racial/sexual minorities and migrants) and supporting genocide.

*maths

Yeah, but I heard it is fine once you wear your tinfoil hat while watching it.

What data are you giving up? That you prefer “Better call Saul” to “Breaking Bad”?

Modern “Televisions” are pretty much smartphones with a big ass screen

So, don’t you think watching on good quality “big ass screen” is nicer?

Are you a bot?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

So, you are complaining that a TV streaming service, with primary focus on streaming onto smart TVs, don’t perform on devices which are not main devices it caters for?

Say what now?

Have you tried an actual TV?

Yes, sweetie. And the obvious conclusion is…?

Holy shit that’s fucking sad

Abilities, sweetie 🤣

Ssshhh, that may blow simpletons brains out.

You see? That’s exactly what I meant when I mentioned your abilities.

I doubt in my ability to explain anything to a person of your abilities.

One which performs of course. And no misogyny involved at all, just realism and reasonable expectations of long term partners sticking to their words.