the latest BRICS summit recently completed

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          What facts did I disagree with? Are you operating with a different concept of what imperialism means, ie a semantical difference but not a logical one? Or am I wrong about Russia having relatively small financial capital and thus lacking the capacity to practice imperialism in the same way western countries do? Or am I wrong about China’s large and key industries being state owned, and their economy incentivizing multilateralism in order to sell more?

          The first would be a semantical difference, not a disagreement with facts, the latter 2 would be if you could provide evidence to the contrary sufficient to outweigh what I said.

          • nebulaone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is just going to result in me pulling up a source that you don’t deem reputable, only for you to pull up a source that I don’t deem reputable.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Maybe, but that would be better than just saying I “disagree with facts” while being cagey about what those “facts” are. That’s just ad hominem (and I mean that genuinely, you’re trying to discredit me through insult, not just insult me).

              Either way, ultimately, this topic has shifted entirely from the base of the conversation, which is trying to find a good measure of economic productivity, and how focusing on financialized capital masked by GDP obscures actual productivity. It’s why imperialist countries are declining, and why the PRC is rising. I don’t think we disagree that western countries are going downhill and that the PRC is improving, so identifying why is productive.

              • nebulaone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think we have come to some kind of a conclusion that neither of us is willing to part from. Maybe I am the idiot and wrong, but I’m good on this for now. Maybe I’ll have some more energy another day.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Fair enough. I recommend reading the ProleWiki page on imperialism I linked, it’s much shorter than reading Lenin (though you absolutely should) and can help get you to look at the problems (presumably) we both experience in decaying western countries, and how we can chart a course for a better world. You can’t find solutions without proper analysis of the underlying problems.

                  • nebulaone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Seems like a very unbiased encyclopedia. If a methodology of analysis is skewed towards presenting what the author intended it is pretty much useless. I haven’t read it yet, this is just a gut feeling, maybe I’ll check it out tomorrow.

      • nebulaone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What do you respond to “Fuck X” , if thats what you’re talking about? Otherwise I have stated my reasoning. If one side isn’t willing to give up anything, it isn’t really a discussion

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      i like how you use the incel mascot; never seen a freudian slip as a comment before.

      • nebulaone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You are confidently wrong, pepe the frog is originally from a stoner comic. Besides, I am married, so the whole incel thing doesn’t exactly check out.

        Edit: Very revealing how absolutely everything I post is downvoted by default, despite this comment being irrefutable fact.