Can something happen without anything else causing it?

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It appears that every action is a reaction (or to use the more customary terminology, every action is an effect of some number of causes, and is in turn a cause for some number of effects).

    However, it must either be the case that there was a first action, which would necessarily be an uncaused effect, or that time is either a loop or is infinite in extent, such that there is no beginning and thus no need for an uncaused effect.

    And none of those possibilities is really intellectually satisfying, so it’s an open question (which doesn’t stop people from insisting on the nominal truth of one or another of them).

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And even with the loop or eternal universe, you can ask where it came from. Like why is it there, and not nothing?

    • eierschaukeln@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for putting so much effort in your answer. If you think about it, it’s kinda scuffed and you either end with existence is not possible or there was an action that was not caused by one. Just like you said.

      • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is the kind of paradox that leads us (I mean humans more generally) to look for some fundamental assumption we’re making about time that will turn out to be wrong. I assume that’s true although I wonder whether it’s literally impossible for us to even imagine how time “truly” works, let alone measure it.