• beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    sounds weird to me. aren’t we replicating the repository problem if each distro decides to make a flatpak repo according to their own philosophies?

      • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        i don’t have an issue with multiple flatpak repos. i’d actually find it very interesting if we went a more decentralized route with flatpak (maybe kde, gnome, mozzila would each have their own repos). but i don’t see the point of a distro-specific flatpak when we already have normal packages. compatibility is kind of a non-issue, since you’re not supposed to install them elsewhere anyway (unlike flatpaks)

        also, i see absolutely no reason to use fedora’s flatpak repo on debian given that flathub exists already. you could add it if you want it, but what’s the point?

    • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, we are. It’s exactly why it shouldn’t be done and why Fedora is the only project wasting their time with this.