Original source, including in-depth tests and other fancy details of the CPU used in the MAXHUB PC itself (written in Mandarin): https://news.mydrivers.com/1/1070/1070803_all.htm
CPU-Z Single-Core Benchmark and specs from the original source:
That’s an 8-core, ~3GHz Base Speed, 32MB L3 cache CPU for the number-crunchers around here.
On the surface, this CPU seems like it’s best suited for general desktop and office use, to see it adopted to a PC build product geared for “AI workloads” is interesting. If I’m not mistaken, AI performance is heavily dependent on the GPU rather than on the CPU, so I think that’s fine:
In terms of performance, the MAXHUB’s AI+ desktop computer is claimed to play 1080P 30fps and 4K 30fps high-bitrate online videos with decent CPU utilization numbers, showing that the KX-7000 CPU acts decently with media workload. Of course, when compared against competitors like Intel or AMD, Zhaoxin is behind, but the key motive here to create an ecosystem that relies entirely on in-house products, and this has apparently happened here.
And that’s a good thing, lol.
If we’re to compare this entry-level CPU clearly designed by a newcomer company and honed for one or two niches, to the current top-of-the-line, catch-all CPU backed by a brand that has had decades in the processor game, then yeah obviously it’s not going to fare well. There’s still some merit to this type of CPU (like say, if the price is right) and it could pave the way for better iterations.
We don’t make the same comparison for the quality & efficiency of healthcare in the brands’ respective countries, now do we? :)
It’s VIA, they’re been around since the dawn of time.
Oh, right 🤦♂️… I missed the mark on that one. Point is, the CPU is pretty good for its intended audience and usecases.