• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why the article only speaks about the game graphics?

    I mean 80 dollars is a shame, and not even for 1 dollar I would ever pay any money to Konami after what they did with Kojima. But the article doesn’t say me nothing about the game itself.

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s a very faithful remake of MGS3. You can play with classic controls or modern controls.

      If you play with the classic controls, it’s basically the same game, plus a few new collectibles. The new controls come with a modern camera system and some balance changes to accommodate the increased player freedom (the tranq gun has bullet drop in this mode, for example). You can change between control modes during the game, but doing so will reload your last checkpoint.

      So it’s good, because MGS3 was good, but it’s not $80 good. And like the article says, at $80 for what is mostly a graphical upgrade you would expect to get all the bells and whistles… but some of them are conspicuously missing.

    • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The aeticle says this is basically the old game (“legacy code”) with a graphical upgrade. Not even known bugs were fixed. This means you’re supposed to pay €80 for just the graphics, pretty much. And they’re not even that good.