• davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Nope, only one of them is a shithole.

    Which one illegally annexed Tibet

    I’m pretty sure virtually all of the Tibetan people are happy to no longer be suffering under theocratic feudalism. Happy to no longer be illiterate serfs and slaves, suffering depredation under a god-king. I doubt many of them are sad that CIA asset Dalai “suck my tongue” Lama is in exile. [1] [2]

    and Hong Kong?

    Entirely legal. In fact it would have been illegal for the UK not to hand it over.

    The UK’s 99 year lease to subjugate Hong Kong ended. A lease which had been forced upon Imperial China at gunpoint during the century of humiliation. Hong Kong reintegration after the lease expired was a foregone conclusion. The last minute, US-backed attempt at color revolution failed.

    Which one is currently genociding Uhygurs?

    Neither, but one of them trained, funded, and organized terrorists in the region, and then made up a genocide narrative, and then imposed illegal sanctions on it using the fabricated genocide narrative as a pretext. Previously.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Idk if it’s just me, but it’s insane to bring up Uhygur genocide, which has not been in the news or mentioned at all for years, while we watch US funded Israel blowing up starving children on a daily basis.