• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    tbf what he did say was inciting violence. You cannot deny that

    • G4Z@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I mean, is it not the same vein as when we say you should punch a nazi?

      Now I mean obviously, he’s wrong and all the rest of it, but I don’t think these kinds of hypotheticals are calls for violence.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        The main difference is the Linham has a history that means it’s probably not a hypothetical. He’s already appearing in court on the fourth for harassing a trans woman and breaking her phone.

        • G4Z@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          The whole tweet was a hypothetical scenario.

          If he’s harassing somebody, then that is a separate matter.

          I’m not condoning his opinions, I don’t agree with him, but I think we should all consider how this might apply to the things we have the freedom to say here (something I am very much in favour of keeping).

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I think we should shoot nazis. Primarily because they are traitors to King and Country.

        I do not think the “punch a nazi” thing was every hypothetical