The charge read: “On February 5 2023 you possessed an extreme pornographic image, which portrayed, in an explicit and realistic way, a person performing an act of intercourse with an animal, namely a fish, which was grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character, and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that such a person or animal was real.”
Wait… So it wasn’t a real photo? It was AI generated or otherwise fabricated?
Wait… So it wasn’t a real photo? It was AI generated or otherwise fabricated?
I would say the article suggests it is AI yes.