• FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would cost? No…it wouldn’t cost, they just wouldn’t get. Cost implies they still have to pay, this just means they won’t get tax money on funds that are already taxes. Do it. Abolish this tax then go after the billionaires who pay nothing for life because rich. Get you funds from them.

    • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      ‘Cost’ is applicable, because this money is money that has factored into the budget and public spending every year. To make up for not having it, you would need to find or cut the same amount of money elsewhere.

      For what its worth, the reason that Tories want to cut this is because it disproportionately taxes the wealthy, and specifically generational wealth. Assets under £375,000 (iirc) are not taxed on inheritance

      Cutting inheritance tax will increase the wealth gap and cost the goverment money at a time when vital public services are still suffering from 13 ongoing years of austerity

      • doleo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You make a good point; if tories want to do it, you can be sure that it benefits them more than you

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Abolish this tax that largely impacts the rich (when they don’t get around it with trusts and exemptions) and tax the rich…?

    • tkc@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it only kicks in at 1 million anyway, and I wouldn’t disagree to it being raised to say 5 million, as it’s entirely possible from a regular person to get a well paying job, and have invested and saved their way to that figure by retirement.

      But scrapping it entirely removes one of the only ways that we do tax billionaires. One of the last thing I’d want is billionaire generational wealth.

        • tkc@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really thought it was higher to be honest. That’s even worse. Fully support it being raised, but not removed.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are a bunch of adjustments, chief among them that if you inherit spouse to spouse then it isn’t taxed and if spouse 1 passes away without using their inheritance tax amount then you get to use their inheritance tax amount too when you pass away, effectively doubling the limit. Among others, like allowances around your primary residence.

            The best thing you can do for your loved ones is leave a Will and a clear paper trail, trust me.