• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    People don’t realize how much shit youtube/google ignores over time, for whatever reasons (but mostly because it’s cheaper to ignoer I’d guess). With most major consumer VPN providers, this is very easy to detect. Adblockers are easy to detect. Tampering with the website structure? Believe it or not, quite easy to detect when someone hide a component or change a title or a button.

    If they decided to seriously get after people that circumvent geofencing, people that block ads, people that change the interface to their liking, or people that plainly use alternative websites, they could easily. And it would require far less effort on their end to keep things complicated than it would require on our end to keep things working at an acceptable level.

    • survirtual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Only kind of true.

      If they did implement all those measures, all you do is launch a puppet browser rendered off screen and scrape the content you want. This could work for any site and it is impossible for anyone to detect.

      For ads, as a nuclear option, you can detect when they occur and black the stream out.

      I would personally do this if left with no other option.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Cue detection of “realistic” human activity on the UI and preventing streaming if the server determine this activity does not match a human enough pattern.

        I’m exaggerating on that one, but… that’s not even that implausible these days.

        My point was, dancing this dance with “big website”, whoever it is, will always be an endless uphill battle.

        • survirtual@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          12 hours ago

          They can’t do that because of accessibility reasons. If they did that, a disabled person has grounds to sue them for proper aria hints & controls.

          It doesn’t matter what kind of content it is, either. It must be made accessible.

          • cley_faye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Uh. I don’t know how it is on the other side of the ocean, but around here, it’s a nice goal, but there’s much more care going into making messes than implementing accessible websites. Even official government services sometimes just barely slaps an “accessibility conformity: partial/none” and keep going on.

            I’m not sure having an accessible web is enough to overcome the thirst for ad money and control.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sometimes I do get YouTube telling me that I need to disable my adblocker to access a video, so they do try to block that stuff (though I suspect that the infrequency with which this happens combined with the fact that not everyone does experience it when some people do report this happening suggests that they’re just testing methods of detection and blocking)

      Usually when it happens, I just go into my Ublock settings and update stuff. I can’t remember that ever not working. It feels like a low-key arms race, in a cold-war kind of way