• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    Stuff like swaybg, despite being very well built, only support setting a single wallpaper on startup. This means, if you want to change the wallpaper during runtime, you must pkill the daemon

    So this…this is the power of Wayland

    • ashx64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      No, it’s a limitation with swaybg so they created a tool that doesn’t have that limitation.

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      …have you actually used Wayland? If you’re using Plasma or GNOME, its indistinguishable from X11 except it actually has a slightly more (inexplicable tbh) polished feel to it.

      This comment is incredibly misinformed

      • offspec@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I still bounce back to x11 over a handful of deal breaking issues I run in to every time I try. Screen shares are extremely low quality, barrier (vkvm software) crashes intermittently, and inevitably I run in to clipboard issues. After a couple of days I just want my computer to work again. I use Plasma

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          In what way? I’ve been using triple monitors for close to a decade now and my KDE switched from X11 to Wayland at some point without me noticing, so I’m wondering what I missed.

            • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Something KDE has done seems to have resolved the issues I used to have with DPI related scaling problems in Wayland. Once Plasma 6 hit, it’s been nothing but rapid improvements with Wayland as a focus and man does it feel nice.

              That said, there’s virtually no downside to still using X unless you have explicit display features you need from Wayland like HDR or the per-display scaling. Xfce is stupid lightweight and still my default for anything where battery life is a benefit.

              • njordomir@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I noticed the same thing with KDE and Wayland. Sometimes my curser still grows 10 sizes or shrinks as I pass over certain windows or between monitors but things are more consistent and predictable than they used to be.

            • chloroken@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The fact that you’re comparing Wayland to XFCE tells us you’re not entirely sure what you’re doing. One is a compositor and the other is a desktop environment.

              Your problems are with GNOME. I dont even think you could define what X11 and Wayland are based on your posts, much less articulate why one is better than the other

              Start by reading about Wayland. Don’t make shit up and defend a position you can’t even articulate. It’s cringe.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah, my monitors are all identical and stay plugged in all the time, so it’s a much less complicated use-case than yours.

              I do have one issue where, because I picked the wrong 9070XT on launch day and couldn’t exchange it due to lack of availability, one of my monitors is on HDMI instead of DisplayPort and takes annoyingly longer to wake from sleep or change modes than the other two. But I think that’s more likely a hardware or driver problem than a Wayland one.

        • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Really? I have two 4k monitors, one being 160hz and I find they’re handled way better by Wayland over X11. Even fractional scaling is perfect now

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah I tried it, out of the gate my favourite WM - i3 isn’t supported.

        I tried some of the other WMs, and they all kinda sucked imo.

        I tried Gnome but it didn’t work for me when I tried using guake.

        I also had issues with Spectacle on Plasma (captured area is just plain white).

        In both - OBS didn’t work properly either (black screen with some capture methods, massive lag with others) and games were a bit laggy (stutters/frame time spikes).

        Last one could be that Wayland doesn’t play nice with the proprietary Nvidia driver or that unlike with Xorg, Proton/SteamPlay dont support launching a gamescope nested session from a Wayland session (or didn’t back when I tried it) which usually ensures silky smooth performance.

        So yeah, this was a while back but.

        • communism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          i3 doesn’t work with Wayland because it’s an X11 WM… You wouldn’t complain about X11 because Sway doesn’t work on it.

          Btw, Sway is a drop-in Wayland replacement for i3 if you want to move to Wayland. i3 configs work with Sway; it’s an i3 clone.