• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    We do, but parental control over minors’ medical procedures becomes a huge issue here. If a 16 year old wants a lifesaving transfusion some places allow their parents to refuse it for them on religious grounds. The same applies to younger children as well.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Meh I was just being needlessly angry and annoyed. I don’t think we should let people die like that. Especially kids. Life saving treatment should never be up to the parents to decide, except in some very specific cases. Once they turn 18 they can make their own decisions, but fuck everything about putting your personal beliefs over your children’s lives and health.

      • TWeaK@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        In this instance it was the 16 year old child themselves refusing, and the hospital determining that she had capacity to do so. That’s why they went for a court order, so the decision and liability wouldn’t fall on them.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Only further goes to show that I should read the fucking article before raging, and then instead of raging stay rational. I give enough shit to others for doing precisely that. :/