• Mr. Satan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You wouldn’t mind writing machine code then? Ok, I’ll give you assembly. It’s all that’s needed to tell a computer what to do.

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Of course I wouldn’t write in raw machine code, or even assembly. We invented higher level languages that are more powerful and easier for humans to use…

      But the purpose is still to make machines so stuff!!! I’m not just writing code so that other humans can marvel at my algorithms.

      This is so freaking dumb.

      • Mr. Satan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        easier for humans to use…

        And that is my point. The primary purpose for all these abstractions is for humans to use. It’s first and foremost designed to be read and understood by humans, to make programming easier for humans.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I mean yeah I guess that’s its primary purpose if you totally ignore the fundamental thing it’s meant to be doing.

          It’s like saying the primary purpose of a seatbelt is to be easy to fasten and unfasten.