NanoooK@sh.itjust.works to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agoAfter GOTY pull, Clair Obscur devs draw line in sand over AI: 'Everything will be made by humans by us'www.polygon.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down16
arrow-up1188arrow-down1external-linkAfter GOTY pull, Clair Obscur devs draw line in sand over AI: 'Everything will be made by humans by us'www.polygon.comNanoooK@sh.itjust.works to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squareNate Cox@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·23 hours agoMy entire post was a rebuttal of the “functionally no different than humans doing the same thing”. Humans take inspiration and use it to express themselves uniquely, genAI just steals and replicates. They are in no way “doing the exact same thing”.
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·21 hours agoSo your entire argument is semantics. Gen AI does more than just replicating existing works. You’re not going to get the same result with the same prompt; each result will be unique. And I’d argue that the person writing the prompt is the one providing the inspiration to get the software to express what’s in their head.
My entire post was a rebuttal of the “functionally no different than humans doing the same thing”.
Humans take inspiration and use it to express themselves uniquely, genAI just steals and replicates. They are in no way “doing the exact same thing”.
So your entire argument is semantics.
Gen AI does more than just replicating existing works. You’re not going to get the same result with the same prompt; each result will be unique.
And I’d argue that the person writing the prompt is the one providing the inspiration to get the software to express what’s in their head.