Hi, I’m looking for a country whose people or government mainly support my values. I’m looking for a country that:
-
supports wildlife protection
-
supports eco-friendly things and solar/wind energy
-
supports freedom of expression and does NOT criminalize queer people, be it trans, gay, bi, pan, intersex, asexual, etc.
-
peaceful, low crime
-
community-oriented
-
equal and just
-
very friendly towards animals, filled with animal sanctuaries and no-kill shelters
-
free education and/or healthcare (preferably education and healthcare are free/government-funded)
-
high taxes are therefore fine to me
-
compassion-oriented
-
affordable food with low unhoused rates and high employment rates


Iceland participates in the ongoing system by which the global north plunders the global south. It’s of course a NATO country, and participates in unequal exchange. Iceland isn’t especially imperialist, just like, say, Texas isn’t especially imperialist, just that these are both participants in a broader system of imperialism.
Ah, I see. I wouldn’t count supporting/enabling/allowing war and famine instead of actively pursuing war and famine in other parts of the world and doing Euro-centric policy with exploiting the other countries plain imperialism per se. It may be cultural imperialism which I’d separate from the “traditional” imperialism by hard power.
I see where you’re coming from and I think how Europe treats other countries often lacks any kind of empathy, consideration or equality, but again, wouldn’t call it imperialism to not mud the waters.
See my other response regarding Germany’s very real participation in full, ecomomic plunder-style imperialism:
I’m calling it imperialism precisely to not muddy the waters. Economic imperialism is how the west functions, past and present, and this is due to the dominance of finance capital and unequal exchange. The idea that imperialism was a thing of the past, and that Germany today runs largely on its own production and not the economic plunder it continues to extract (along with the west collectively) is fundamentally incorrect.
Understood, but I disagree and maintain that this form of globalised exploitation and unequal exchange is not the same as imperialism. It can be argued that it’s economic imperialism but I think that’s also not quite the right term if the other criteria of economic imperialism aren’t met.
What “other criteria” are you referring to, here? Why isn’t this imperialism proper?
Taking control of the legislative, executive or judicative, for example.
Those are some of the measures by which imperialism is maintained, not imperialism outright.