Then the government “owns” the land. Doing something like the tree that owns itself except with all land would be even better, assuming people respect the laws. My vision would be more of a shared stewardship of the land rather than a drive to exploit it.
Then the government “owns” the land. Doing something like the tree that owns itself except with all land would be even better, assuming people respect the laws. My vision would be more of a shared stewardship of the land rather than a drive to exploit it.
Why exactly is it wrong for land to be owned and used by the public?
What do you think “shared stewardship of the land” means?
I’m asking why you’re so opposed to public ownership.