• woteorin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So, in the live feed the BBC has going, there’s a post suggesting that a group of explorers were apparently on board based on one of them’s Facebook feed, so it’s safe to say they probably had the full passenger set on there.

    • RedMarsRepublic@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Really a stretch to call these people ‘explorers’. Apparently one of them made their billions hawking private jets. Sucks to be him…

      • woteorin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        One of the other posts in the feed makes it sound like they only do it a handful of times a year, and that cost is covering a multi-day excursion since they have to wait for conditions to be right. Still, no excuse to not have contingencies, but I think their take gets eaten into a fair bit more than the raw math would suggest.

        • misguidedfunk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wager they don’t have a recovery vessel because they have people sign contracts only allowing arbitration.

          • StringTheory@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            The CBS guy read aloud part of the thing he had to sign when he rode on it.

            And the video is horrifying on so many levels…

          • woteorin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            I wouldn’t be surprised. But, I suspect there’s also a factor of just implausibility. Apparently, the main vessel they use is “experimental”, so it may just literally be impossible to have a recovery vessel without being a literal government.

            My money’s on this being the result of someone ignoring the “hey, these are not good conditions” warnings.

              • jellyfish@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                The bit with the contract starts @2:40. At least you can’t say they didn’t know what they were getting into. Still an awful way to go, if it did implode at depth, at least it’d be quick.

                • StringTheory@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I think I’d rather implode and go instantly, than be floating on the surface for 4 days and unable to get out while slowly suffocating.

                  Neither is my idea of a good time…

                  • Pigeon@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Can they not open a hatch if it’s on the surface?

                    Water would be a problem still, but not suffocation, if so.

        • schzztl@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          According to the CEO the whole business isn’t even profitable. They spent over a million on gas alone. At least this jerryrigged contraption sinking is the most effective way for their company to stop shitting up the atmosphere.