The only source I would trust here that you linked is the famous 1998 CJR article. It just points out the misnomer caused by what we call the incident to point out that mass killings happened elsewhere while students were peacefully evacuated from the square itself. Of course I also trust the photos you linked are real. But just like the aforementioned myth (also explored by the CJR article), you perpetuate the myth of the crackdown being on primarily student protests when far far more of the dead were of the inspired workers’ protest, especially those killed as the army was heading into Tiananmen. Such violent crackdowns made it so Deng could not recover his influence until 1992.

Yes, students did stone and kill soldiers and Molotov APCs, including the lynching of (just) one soldier as depicted in the photos. But that does not justify the hundreds of protestors killed with live ammunition. Yes, there was no carnage in the square during the Tiananmen square massacres. Misnomers abound. But as a person I try to get others to understand me in communication. Yes, the “Tiananmen square” part is a misnomer. But who’s gonna understand me if I go about every day saying “June Fourth Incident”? Not to mention a lot of the killings were also committed around 11 PM the previous day.

I also did a bit of a misnomer: It’s dubious whether you could define the mass killings as massacres. My point was that China ordered the army to do what they did. It sounds to me like Kirp was characterizing the other regions’ hatred to blame for what happened around Tiananmen, which hopefully we can agree was not what happened.

China gave orders to massacre, so it’s no surprise they got a massacre.

Since that’s organized under each state they probably feel good about their own states.

:notlikethis:

same as why they keep source code public

It seems to be unspecified “automated and manual” systems plus reports from the NCMEC https://lemm.ee/post/65739566/20890503 , which they process quite fast https://lemm.ee/post/65739566/20890630 .

At the canteen table, I brought it up once during a tangentially-related conversation and they were all very surprised. Minutes later, while the others were getting the fill, one of them even privately went up to me and confirmed.

well what if i only shower once a week and none of my friends complain?

yeah i usually just add an extra “apple”

“help with microsoft windows app”, on the other hand…

no, that’s… just not how I remember it. the tabs worked well except you couldn’t tear them (drag 'n drop them into another file explorer window) and i wasn’t able to make it open new file explorer windows as tabs in my time

sh itjust works

no people post their own puzzles there for others to solve

Yet another reason why the Puzzling Stack Exchange is so interesting.

at least it’s airtight

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FJeff_V._Merkey&oldid=324345203

Insta is all thirst traps somehow.

You get recommended what you see. My Instagram is all photography.

criminals are the result of bad rearing. if people weren’t poor and parents would parents, no criminal laws would be needed

Again, this is gambling, and gambling is not scamming. What else do you propose to fix providing gambling services to children?

people store id in their phone most of the time.

No. Everyone Gen X and Y that I know of have passports in a cabinet and IDs in a wallet.

You can make filters for specific mailing lists (in the worst case based on the reply-to header), and I think the tiny bit of convenience tradeoff for centralizing all messages is a benefit.

Fair point about filtering by labels. I personally think consolidated tickets (which are labeled and implemented by sourcehut) should be separate from issue reports, for less identifier inflation if nothing else.

a mostly disorganized flow of messages

Unlike chatrooms, mailing lists also have threads just like any forum.

What can’t you get out of a mailing list? You can customize exactly how it displays, and SourceHut visualizes the code review part. What’s missing? (I don’t think reactions contribute much.)