Nemo's public admirer

A person who’s from r/ലാൽ_സലാം and r/കേരള

  • 32 Posts
  • 413 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 16th, 2023
  • Nemo's public admirer@lemmy.sdf.orgtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•How do we get people to read theory?
    2·
    7 days ago

    Bite-sized stuff?

    I see cool quotes or memes that are also linked to recent/contemporary things and it gets my interest to look more into it

    I have a friend and she thinks “its posh” to read theory.

    Well, maybe recommending things that would be directly useful for her or things that she likes would be good?
    And tell that it’ll also be useful to counter fake narratives and provide clarity in talking about it to others?

  • Nemo's public admirer@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•Lemmy libs: "But stalin baddd mkayyy"
    5·
    29 days ago

    For most folks in the west, stalin is considered to be a brutal authoritarian dictator who made a deal with the nazis to carve up europe into spheres of influence.

    Do they not know of how the western leaders enabled the Nazis to carve up Czechoslovakia and opposed USSR’s call for a united front against Nazis?

    The Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression pact, USSR happened after the Munich agreement where Britain, France and Italy came together to allow the Nazis and Poland to annex Czechoslovakia.

    And if you think there were no agreements before:
    1934 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Polish_declaration_of_non-aggression
    1935 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_Naval_Agreement
    1938 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
    1939 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact

    And the next para from the text you quoted goes into the reasons, right? Searched with the text you shared and got this:

    The point is that Marxism and anarchism are built up on entirely different principles, in spite of the fact that both come into the arena of the struggle under the flag of socialism. The cornerstone of anarchism is the individual, whose emancipation, according to its tenets, is the principal condition for the emancipation of the masses, the collective body. According to the tenets of anarchism, the emancipation of the masses is impossible until the individual is emancipated. Accordingly, its slogan is: “Everything for the individual.” The cornerstone of Marxism, however, is the masses, whose emancipation, according to its tenets, is the principal condition for the emancipation of the individual. That is to say, according to the tenets of Marxism, the emancipation of the individual is impossible until the masses are emancipated. Accordingly, its slogan is: “Everything for the masses.”

    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1906/12/x01.htm

    How do you see his critique? Do you think that anarchism cares less about wider social emancipation?
    I don’t have much experience with literature on Anarchism(or Marxism, but relatively better there), so would be cool to know your opinions on it

  • Nemo's public admirer@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•But according to the libs round here, ChInA BaDDDDddd
    2·
    2 months ago

    manipulate Tibet

    Was not Tibet having theocracy and serfdom?

    Uyghurs

    Who were the folk mainly raising the point of Uyghurs tho?
    The white supremacist govts who are enabling and engaging in the Genocide in Palestine?

    Like, for MLs this would seem like anti-vaxx conspiracies, right?

    Taiwan’s independence

    Both of them are named Republics of China, right?
    Their own people also seem to wish for reunification, right? Tho, they obviously seem to have dissimilar opinions on which govt they should come under after unification.