I’ll take it from your immediate descent into lazy personal attacks that you don’t actually have a point

Spell out your point or shutup, stop being cryptic

All it’s forms? So you oppose national borders? Private property ownership? Do you think Donbas should be allowed to leave Ukraine?

Correct, what’s your point?

Yeah, that’s the problem with Republicans, they’re not loyal enough patriots…

You do realise that the whole point of the United Nations is so that things like that this don’t happen anymore.

No? The point of the UN is to stop actual wars, not what the UK is trying to describe as war, which are things that the west has been consistently doing for the entire lifetime of the UN.

So how can we not be at war with an entity so fundamentally untrustworthy.

Because a lot of countries are fundamentally untrustworthy? Including all of the ones who are signed onto the Rome Statute who are still supporting Israel. Which includes the UK. If you really want to redefine terms so that any untrustworthy country is inherently at war, then the UK is at war with the entire world.

You are complaining that the West is at war with Russia

No, I’m pointing out that the West isn’t at war with Russia, and it’s an Orwellian abuse of language to say they are.

that’s because Russia is constantly breaking the rules

There is no rule that Russia has broken that the west, especially the UK, hasn’t repeatedly and flagrantly violated both in the past and currently.

Your problem is that you’ve already decided who is right and who is wrong and you’re not going to allow anything like reality to get in the way of that.

Wrong. Nothing I have said implies that; I’m guessing this is a go to straw-man you go to, but it most certainly doesn’t apply to me. If anything, it sounds like you’re projecting; you’ve already decided whos wrong and that’s why you’re not actually reading or responding to what I’m saying.

I didn’t mean other countries were doing things do the West, lol.

I meant the West has constantly been doing to most of the world what westerners are no trying to describe as “war” when Russia does it. Hell, the Russian Federation isn’t doing anything to the West that the West hasn’t been doing to it since the day it was formed

Imagine if westerners applied the same standard for “at war” to themselves that they do to Russia: they’d basically have been at war with most of the world for the last century.

Reanimator

Saying the rent is the people’s rent

Well that’s a strawman that nobody says

An ad-hominem is whataboutism: “Whatabout this thing that’s bad about you!” It’s an attempt to distract from the point with an irrelevant distraction.

Running some McCarthyist “litmus test” is irrelevant to what I said. At best it’s whataboutism, at worst it’s just fishing for an ad-hominem.

how is what they brought up not relevant to the topic

Literally 100% or instances of liberals using the term whataboutism are them referring to something that is relevant to the general topic.

Where?

whataboutism is when you use irrelevant topics to incorrectly prove a point.

Yes, which is exactly what they did.

Whataboutism

Whataboutism

Whataboutism

Whataboutism

What exactly do you think “brigade” means?

Yeah, I was subject to the same heavy propaganda you were, only difference is that I was mindful enough of it to not let it get me to the point of saying absurd nonsense like what you said.

Also, you can’t really do the whole “I know I’m also not immune to propaganda” thing when you were just mindlessly regurgitating it to explicitly defend the British state propaganda network.

Jesus, westerners really are the most propagandised people on Earth