It’s still an ethical dilemma

Just branding, market positioning

Literally all of them have tried at some point. But honestly you just end up with a bunch of effectively streaming services that you have to pay for.

I already have hbo, Netflix, krangle + and Hulu and YouTube and now I need «randomyoutuber+» x10 too?

Yeah no thanks

Literally his income source

I’m sceptical of his steamdeck hosting solution :p hope he has backup for his files too

I think he actually used something else than proton, he didn’t mention though. Except that he uses his own domain name.

I drive believe he has started hosting his own email though

I’m fairly sure So you can’t just game the SEO to always be on top. This way you get more varied spurces for your search. Since people will almost always click the top or second top link.

That’s by design

It’s a core game mechanic

This like complaining that jumping is required to beat Mario

Of course, if you read the article you’ll see that the model found the bugk 8 out of 100 attempts.

It was prompted what type of issue to look for.

I agree…

It’s very rewarding

I can imagine this data would sell for quite a bit of money. Networks love to winge about how much they lose to piracy

As long as their login page also does that :p

This seems to be very common still

Doesn’t matter anymore, it’s like 90% ai slop now.

Interior designers

Very cyberpunk

To add to this, I host Confusion for image generation

It’s against tos to stream video you don’t own the rights to

I’m assuming you don’t just stream home made movies

Stemming pirated Covent is against tos