But doesn’t surviving an explosion imply that they did in fact get exploded? Just cause it ain’t kill em doesn’t mean they didn’t go through it

Well they still got blown up didn’t they?

The chopping technique is about eliminating risk, mostly. Sure for a single meal and being aware you’ll be fine. But getting into the habit of a good technique means you’ll be fine even when you’re tired or distracted

That looks like it’s probably a great game for someone like 5 years older than me tbh. I think I just missed the nostalgia train necessary for that kind of game

Yeah I’ll be buying this. This is the game I’ve had in my head for the last 5 years

Yeah, that was my guess too. I never got around to looking into it properly before I ended up having to wipe it for sale anyways

Libreoffice does something weird to files. Not sure what it is, but I had to use it to fix my bash config at one point and then every time I launched my terminal after that I would get a “command not found:” line with no command, but the terminal still worked so I never bothered to figure it out lol

At the time of posting, my most powerful computing device was my phone lol

Unless your threat modelling includes nation-states

At which point you should have a handful of extra layers

This is anecdotal

Not just anecdotal. The default SSH port gets hit by ridiculous numbers of bots because a lot of people don’t bother to change it. This will be true no matter what machine you’re on. Hell, your desktop at home has probably been scanned quite a few times even if all you do is watch porn on it

While you’re not wrong, we still need to understand it at least well enough to avoid RCE and fix memory-related bugs

In what universe would someone have looked at that and gone…

I repeated you nearly word for word, only substituting a few words. Go ahead and look up “parody”

The point you were parroting

And again with words in my mouth. That wasn’t even close to my point!

My point was that you were unnecessarily sarcastic in a rude way to someone. Beyond that, your comment made absolutely no sense because you were telling them that they were mad at the tool instead of the way the people are using the tool. Which, if you go back and read their comments, is what they were actually upset about. They didn’t make much, if any comment about AI itself, but rather the way people are using it.

There’s a good argument to be made that they shouldn’t be…

And this is it

Please do me a favor and quote the part of that comment where I claimed I’m fine with the way AI is made.

Ok, but… You know there’s a person operating that AI right?

You seem to be separating the tool from the user. Which is not rare, but it is weird.

Care a mel shlarmle

I believe the word you’re looking for is anthropocentrism

I banned myself off Reddit. Deleted my 10 year old account because fuck em.

I didn’t, unfortunately, obfuscate my comments before deleting them. However, I find solace in thinking that there is a small win in leaving all of that socialist propaganda in their training data

You’re giving the wrong reinforcement for the wrong reason. You’re afraid of what they may do in several years, so you’re negatively reinforcing the good decision they’re making right now. You should, instead, give them positive reinforcement for making good decisions so that they continue to make good decisions. What you’re currently doing is discouraging them from making public statements about their policy changes.