Help, my cat stepped on the button, how do I recover my data?

To prevent accidental and catastrophic presses, the drive’s self-destruct button is designed with a two-stage sliding switch.

Looks like they prevent that.

Quoting the teaser text

Google’s Pixel 10 works with AirDrop, and other phones should follow later.

How do you rsync between an android and iOS device? Is it as simple as airdrop?

How many people did you betray until now? :p

Grapple Dog, was gifted to me via giveaway. It’s pretty good, a decent enough title.

I like weird. Of course they mean something different when they say weird.

Regarding your last point, it seemed pretty clear to me that they gave only one or few URLs to AdGuard, AdGuard informed archivetoday, and they removed that content. What they’re saying here is that the other URLs, the other illegal content they did not even disclose URLs to, still exist and have not been removed. Which is obvious, why would they have been removed when they are not known or reported.

This understanding of mine is supported by their text earlier in the document where they talk about having shared only few of those they know of, and that these are available upon request by law enforcement or adguard.

All of this still leaves open why they do not report the illegal content themselves, so that it gets removed. And the answer seems likely to be: So they can report to proxies with the intention that archivetoday gets blocked on “proxy” services.

It they’re not willing to admit fault then they’re inevitably announcing or implying standing opposite to and working against their workers.

The org in question, website linked to in the article, published a response/“rebuttal” press release.

I shared my assessment and conclusions from reading it in this comment.

The AdGuard post is certainly much more convincing than their “rebuttal” with logical errors and misrepresentations.

The Haiket website doesn’t seem to disclose anything about the people, company, org, or group behind it.

The privacy policy does not disclose them as processors by name either.

The privacy policy GDPR section does not talk about shared information, presumably because they don’t because they can’t without consent, but the California section says:

Please see the “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” section and “Limit the Use or Disclosure of My Sensitive Personal Information” section for more information on how to opt out and limit the use of sensitive information collected.

Implying a default no-explicit-consent selling of personal and sensitive personal information outside of the GDPR regions.

It’s in the name after all. “No one lives forever”. Ironic.

None that they send you is unique to you.

By not transporting via https you can not be sure about that, because you can’t be sure it’s them sending you the data.

An injecting proxy could add ads, or scams to the content.

It may not make a difference on the sending end, but it does on the receiving end.

Him playing while answering is peak 😄

If they’re strong enough, you have to pull only once anyway /s

What if I’m only role-playing for the skins?

What I discovered upon closer inspection, however, is that Omarchy’s firewall doesn’t actually run, despite its pre-configured ruleset.

lol, oops

Better start posting

It may depend on the country and state, but with a lack of heirs, it likely goes to the state like all other possessions. I’m no expert on this, though.

If you make a good effort to identify, locate, and contact copyright holders, but the path runs cold, can you disregard copyright? Maybe by claiming fair use or lack of traceable copyright?

Trademark requires active use. I don’t believe there’s such a thing for copyright. Are there limits other than regular fair use and documented year expiration?

I was irritated by this statement too, but the sentence continues with “but only if it looks like Robocop”.

I don’t know about the Robocop reference, but the author seems to agree that it’s merely pseudo futuristic. IMO in the worst, most absurd way possible.