Eat! They are so tasty

I remember in a random German movie it being a minor plot point that a mother uses her own milk for her coffee

Well, duh, no one wanted to watch it in fucking Qatar.

Never worked on Ruby, so I definitely cannot judge it, but that syntax looks so uncomfortable…

It looks strangely satisfying

I mean I was mad and then watched the video… and I don’t think that’s worth the rage and the provoking headline tbh.

Uhm, the web is to share content, not to play JS

The web doesn’t have a single unified purpose. Even if I hate it as a programming language, JavaScript if the basis almost all client-side browser operations build upon.

Sure, a simple website which just contains information works without it, but if you design a website in which the client does anything interactively and not everything should be processed server-side, it’s not really possible. No matter if you’re talking about a web game, something like Google Earth or an in-browser editor.

I, as a user, should be able to switch off javascript and have the site work exactly as it does with javascript turned on.

I mean… many websites rely on JavaScript, so it’s kind of obvious that they don’t work without it. If it would work without JS in the first place, the website wouldn’t need to embed any JS code.

This is satisfying: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kot7Fge7RRU

I’ve noticed this a month ago or so, but not on Reddit but for Wikipedia. And it’s genuinely so awful, and cringe and bad in comparison to the normal description that just works great.

I mean that’s literally happening through coal power plants, non-electric cars and so on. We should really stop that weather modification!

I wish…

Average pull request

Too young. Most facebook users are actually boomers nowadays.

That’s a generational thing. 99% of my friends and people of my age I know have never had Facebook. Instagram, however…

As someone who has never heard of that: What would have been its advantages over Lemmy?

Then… that’s so fucking weird, why would someone make that issue? I genuinely lack the understanding for how this could have happened in that case.

I mean, even if it’s annoying someone obviously used AI, they probably still have that problem and just suck at communicating that themselves

I do see that point of view, but honestly, I think it’s totally valid and understandable to point this out whenever they’re mentioned.

Context? Who’s that and what does he have to do with this post?