• 2 Posts
  • 157 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 5th, 2024

help-circle








  • I was going to say that this might actually be a good idea, but then I remembered how often AI summaries get key details completely the wrong way around.

    I still think it’s a good idea in concept: modding is hard, or so I hear, and this could be a very valuable tool if it worked as it’s supposed to. I doubt it would.

    There are some details that I’d have done differently too, if I was somehow forced to implement something like this. For example, for each point in the summary (e.g. “talks about US politics”) there should be a list of comments/posts by the user to exemplify what they say and how they write. It’s useless if the summary doesn’t show you what it’s based on.


  • Great question, very interested to hear the answer if anyone knows. Please mention me, future posters!

    I expect the answer to be very different for Gaza and for the west bank.

    My best guesses (NOT BASED ON KNOWLEDGE, JUST SPECULATION):

    West Bank perhaps can connect to Israeli telecom service providers. I’m guessing that’s what Israeli settlements in the west bank do, so no reason why Palestinian cities wouldn’t do that too.

    As for Gaza, again their only telecommunications have to be through Israel. It appears that Israel can literally just stop the internet service (and electricity and water for that matter), and Gaza would be in the dark. The fact that Israel isn’t doing this is a bit of an enigma to me - not because I think they should (I don’t), but because it’s very obvious the the Israeli government thinks it should. Some ministers have literally said as much.






  • I’m guessing (not sure) that AltGr, visible in the picture, switches between the two options like Shift would. Shift still switches case.

    I think the main reason they didn’t make an umlaut modifier is that ä is considered a distinct letter from a. It would be like asking why have a key for w (“double u”) when it could have been typed as uu. Not a perfect analogy but the best I can think of right now.


  • I see, that’s different from how I interpreted it. Thanks for clarifying.

    I don’t really see it that way. To me it’s not downplaying anything. AI ‘hallucinations’ are often disastrous, and they can and do cause real harm. The use of the term in no way makes human hallucinations sound any less serious.

    As a bit of a tangent, unless you experience hallucinations yourself, neither you nor I know how those people who do feel about the use of this term. If life has taught me anything, it’s that they won’t all have the same opinion or reaction anyway. Some would be opposed to the term being used this way, some would think it’s a perfect fit and should continue. At some point, changing language to accommodate a minority viewpoint just isn’t realistic.

    I don’t mean this as a blanket statement though, there are definitely cases where I think a certain term is bad for whatever reason and agree it should change. It’s a case by case thing. The change from master to main as the default branch name in git springs to mind. In that case I actually think the term master is minimally offensive, but literally no meaning is lost if switching to main and that one is definitely not offensive so I support the switch. For ‘hallucination’ it’s just too good of a fit, and is also IMO not offensive. Confabulation isn’t quite as good.



  • None of this would happen if people recognized that, at best, AI has the intelligence level of a child. It has a lot of knowledge (some of which is hallucinated, but that’s besides the point) but none of the responsibility that you’d hope an adult would have. It’s also not capable of learning from its own mistakes or being careful.

    There’s a whole market for child safety stuff: corner foam, child-proof cabinet locks, power plug covers, etc… You want all of that in your system if you let the AI run loose.